2000000000000

Your money. Our alternative.

The European Commission and Parliament are proposing the largest EU budget in history. Much of it fails the subsidiarity test. There is a better way.
~€400 bn.
gap between Parliament and EPICENTER proposals
€220 bn.
gap between Commission and EPICENTER proposals
The Commission wants to spend €1.76 trillion of taxpayer money over 7 years, a 32% increase over the current budget. The Parliament's proposal pushes the total close to €2 trillion. We show it can be done for €1.54 trillion, at roughly 1% of EU GNI, without sacrificing a single core function of the Single Market. The difference is a policy choice, not a necessity.

New EU taxes should mean lower national ones

The Commission proposes €58 billion per year in new EU-level revenues: a corporate levy (CORE), tobacco duties (TEDOR), an e-waste charge, ETS and CBAM transfers. Without a binding guarantee that every euro raised at EU level is matched by a euro cut nationally, this is a net tax increase on 450 million Europeans. EU tax revenues already stand at 39% of GDP, 13 points above the United States.
58bn/year

New EU-level revenues

39%

Average tax burden in the EU

26%

Average tax burden in the US

Europe doesn't lack capital. It has €8 trillion sleeping

The Commission says public borrowing must fill Europe's investment gap. But as ECB President Lagarde has shown, if Europeans invested in equity markets at the same rate as Americans, €8 trillion would flow into productive investment. EU pension assets sit at 28% of GDP. In the US, it's 143%. That's a €19.7 trillion retirement savings gap. The answer isn't more government debt. It's pension reform and capital market integration.
0T
Retirement savings gap
28%

EU pension assets (% of GDP)

143%

US pension assets (% of GDP)

EU subsidies won't fix what regulation broke

The €409 billion European Competitiveness Fund puts Brussels in charge of picking winners through grants, loans, and equity stakes. Yet the EU's own track record undermines the case: Horizon Europe's mainstream grants attract just €0.09 in private co-investment for every €1 of public money. Northvolt, a flagship of EU-backed industrial policy, went bankrupt. The subsidiarity principle exists for a reason.
409bn

Competitiveness Fund

A budget Europe can agree on, not fight over for years

The last MFF negotiation dragged on for nearly three years. A 2020 repeat would leave Europe scrabbling over the budget at a time of war, geopolitical competition, and economic stagnation. Our alternative is designed to be politically achievable: it respects subsidiarity, focuses spending on genuine Single Market functions, and gives member states back the fiscal space to fund their own priorities. A leaner budget isn't austerity. It's a budget that can actually get agreed.

Build your own budget

Each category starts at the Commission's proposed level. Drag below or above to build your own MFF. Categories flagged as failing the subsidiarity test are spending the EPICENTER paper argues should return to member states.

Adjust the spending

Commission EPICENTER Fails subsidiarity

Get your budget — and the full Alternative MFF.

We'll email your custom allocation in a clean format you can share with colleagues, drop into a briefing, or post on LinkedIn.

  • Your slider-by-slider allocation, formatted for sharing
  • The full Alternative Budget report (PDF, on signup)
  • Monthly briefings on EU policy from member think tanks

Budget growth 2000-2034
Spending only ever moves upward
The EU risks a trajectory where spending increasing subsantially without proper justification. EPICENTER argues for a disciplined 1% GNI cap through smarter prioritisation.
Keep the next MFF at 1% of the EU's Gross National Income
MFF periodBudget
2000–2006€712 billion
2007–2013€975 billion
2014–2020€1.08 trillion
2021–2027€1.21 trillion
2028–2034 (European Parliament)€2 trillion
2028–2034 (Commission)€1.76 trillion
2028–2034 (EPICENTER)€1.54 trillion

See the full picture

Explore every budget heading, read our chapter-by-chapter analysis, or go straight to the recommendations.

Watch the 90-second explainer

How €1.76 trillion became the number — and what the alternative looks like